Visit Michael Sautter's column >>

MICHAEL SAUTTERHome Page

Veteran of Foreign Peace - Returned Peace Corps Volunteer
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 652; Links Seeded: 5578
Member Since: 3/2006Last Seen: 11/27/2009

The Biggest Box Office Bombs of 2006 (with poll)

Live Poll

What is the worst movie of 2006?

  • 1. A Good Year
    0%
  • 2. Wicker Man
    0%
  • 3. All the King's Men
    0%
  • 4. Lady in the Water
    11%
  • 5. Poseidon
    11%
  • 6. Basic Instinct 2
    38%
  • 7. Flyboys
    0%
  • 8. Flushed Away
    5%
  • 9. The Fountain
    14%
  • 10. Freedomland
    8%
  • 11. Other, please leave in comments
    14%

Total Votes: 37

advertisement

What is the worst movie of 2006?

The Biggest Box Office Bombs of 2006

(according to Variety)

I thought that this would be a good place to start looking for bad movies.

1. A Good Year

Russell Crowe in a romantic comedy.

2. Wicker Man

Nicolas Cage in a re-make.

3. All the King's Men

Sean Penn in a re-make.

4. Lady in the Water

M. Night's first box office bomb.

5. Poseidon

Another re-make.

6. Basic Instinct 2

Was this sequel really necessary?
Continued Sharon Stone's 11-year string of bombs.

7. Flyboys

About pilots in World War 1, partially financed
by software billionaire Larry Ellison of Oracle.

8. Flushed Away

Animated, with a $90 million shortfall
between cost and domestic sales.

9. The Fountain

A transcendental love story (for all those
people tired of romantic comedies).

10. Freedomland

An urban kidnapping thriller.

11. Other

Please leave in comments.

Note: I got this list from the Reuters article Crowe and Cage in year's biggest bombs .

  • 15 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
7.9
4.0
1.6
{"commentId":447109,"authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}

I'm not going to vote since I haven't seen most of these movies. I would be inclined to vote for Lady in the Water since it's not a sequel or re-make (which are usually bad to anyway) and from M. Night who has a decent track record.

{"commentId":447109,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:29 AM EST
{"commentId":448416,"authorDomain":"DigitalRob"}

I just watched Lady in the Water. I liked it, but I understand why it didn't do well at the box office.

1) The trailer didn't help potential views grasp any concept of the plot.
2) The movie's pacing, like The Village, was slow.
3) To me, it appears to be a unique story, not something that many movie goers appreciate.

I'm a big fan of Shyamalan. He takes time to tell his stories, and he loads on the symbolism and metaphors, which I've noticed most people don't even notice.

In Lady in the Water, I think the use of the critic to point out the obvious metaphor & film stereotypes was hilarious.

I agree that Lady was a bomb, but I from the previews, I never thought it would be successful.

Before having kids, my wife and I went to the movies every weekend. This year, 2006, I thought it was odd that there were numerous weekends where there wasn't a single movie I had any desire to see. Since I like just about everything, I'd say that the movies released this year lacked some pizzaz.

-Rob

{"commentId":448416,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"DigitalRob"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:16 PM EST
{"commentId":448419,"authorDomain":"DigitalRob"}

BTW, I voted for Poseidon, which I think lost the most money this year.

Sorry for the double post.

-Rob

{"commentId":448419,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"DigitalRob"}
  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:17 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":447156,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

I think "worst" is a bad word -- because many of these movies faired well critically. (I'm thinking Flushed Away in particular. I suspect it will earn it's money back in DVD rentals and sales.)

I would say: "Most unseen (underviewed?) movies of 2006"

I guess I just don't see bombing at the box office as an indicator of quality (or a lack thereof.)

{"commentId":447156,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:16 AM EST
{"commentId":447202,"authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}

I thought that this would be a good place to start looking for bad movies.

{"commentId":447202,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}
  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:42 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":447195,"authorDomain":"rhoward"}

I only saw Lady in the Water and Freedomland. Freedomland lacked direction to be a good movie.

I actually liked Lady in the Water for what it was mean to be, a children's story.

Rick

{"commentId":447195,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"rhoward"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:40 AM EST
{"commentId":447568,"authorDomain":"greathoj"}

I haven't seen any of these, nor have I even heard of five of the ten listed. Perhaps I should spend more time watching TV?

The only movie that came out this year that I can remember actually wanting to go see was "The Departed" (it's got Jack freakin' Nicholson!!), but I try to avoid theaters anymore. At $10 per ticket, it's just as cheap to wait for the damn movie to be released on DVD and buy it then.

{"commentId":447568,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"greathoj"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:38 PM EST
{"commentId":447680,"authorDomain":"tcervo"}

Basic Instinct 2...by far. While the others listed were avoided for one reason or another, I think you could argue at least one redeeming quality of each. The same cannot be said for Basic Instinct 2.

{"commentId":447680,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"tcervo"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:51 PM EST
{"commentId":447706,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

I don't know. Did anyone actually expect Basic Instinct 2 to be even decent? It's like kicking a man that is already down. When I choose a bad movie as worst of the year, I like to aim for the movie that tried real hard and still fell flat on its face in failure.

{"commentId":447706,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:05 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":447770,"authorDomain":"Paradox460"}

Snakes on a plane.

{"commentId":447770,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"Paradox460"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:36 PM EST
{"commentId":447787,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

AMEN!

{"commentId":447787,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 3 votes
#6.1 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:44 PM EST
{"commentId":447883,"authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}

Killjoys. :P

{"commentId":447883,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}
  • 2 votes
#6.2 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:53 PM EST
{"commentId":447924,"authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}

Snakes on a Plane . . . the title has me intrigued, what's it about?

{"commentId":447924,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}
  • 5 votes
#6.3 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:31 PM EST
{"commentId":448157,"authorDomain":"thepef"}

Snakes on a Plane :)

{"commentId":448157,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"thepef"}
  • 2 votes
#6.4 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:15 PM EST
{"commentId":448246,"authorDomain":"russrenshaw"}

My vote goes for those motherf***in' snakes on that motherf***in' plane!

{"commentId":448246,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"russrenshaw"}
  • 2 votes
#6.5 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:19 PM EST
{"commentId":451203,"authorDomain":"Paradox460"}

Anyone seen the trailer for Epic Movie? It is going to be the new scary movie, especially the parodies on Narnia and SonaP

{"commentId":451203,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"Paradox460"}
  • 2 votes
#6.6 - Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:52 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":448131,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}

Basically 2006 was rife with bombs... all equally bad... I do think however that this is the come back year where finally hollywood realizes people do not like crappy movies... so we are seeing movies like "the departed" and such come out which are high drama, low idiot action, intriguing story lines... etc.

{"commentId":448131,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:04 PM EST
{"commentId":448191,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

There were quite a good deal of high quality or at least entertaining comedies this year. However, the dramas and thrillers were mostly pathetic.

{"commentId":448191,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:32 PM EST
{"commentId":449056,"authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}

I was excluding comedy... any comedy is a good comedy for me:-)

{"commentId":449056,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"behindmyscreen"}
  • 2 votes
#7.2 - Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:57 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":448232,"authorDomain":"dehehn"}

I have to say box office returns is not necessarily a sign of a bad movie. In many cases it simply means it wasn't mainstream enough and audiences weren't comfortable with it. I find I often disagree with American audiences opinions on a movies cinematic worth.

I would have to say the worst movie I've seen is for sure Eragon. Terrible script, cliched story, terrible editing, awful direction...nice special effects, overall terrible.

{"commentId":448232,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"dehehn"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#8 - Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:07 PM EST
{"commentId":448480,"authorDomain":"edomaniac"}

Phat Girlz, currently the worst movie ever made according to imdb.com, though Troll 2 is a close second.

{"commentId":448480,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"edomaniac"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:29 AM EST
{"commentId":448526,"authorDomain":"masem"}

Certainly as seeded, these are the financial bombs in terms of costs to make and box office receipts, but I think the better way, if you're polling bombs defined by critics, I'd use Rotten Tomatoes, which gives me this list (any with tomato ratings under 10%)(search terms I used)

Date Movie
Conversations with God
Big Momma's House 2
BloodRayne
Doogal
Basic Instinct 2
UltraViolet
Stay Alive
See No Evil
The Covenant
Zoom
Crossover
Deck the Halls

What there almost needs to be is a ratio of advertising and hype dollars to something similar to the Tomato ratings to really define the ultimate bombs - movies that the studio spends tons of money pushing out but resulting in terrible ratings.

{"commentId":448526,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"masem"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#10 - Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:44 AM EST
{"commentId":449573,"authorDomain":"dehehn"}

Much better list.

{"commentId":449573,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"dehehn"}
    #10.1 - Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:42 PM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":449436,"authorDomain":"celestina"}

    Ooh..Ultraviolet was so bad, I couldn't even finish it. I will watch pretty much anything just to watch Milla, but that was just...pathetic. It definitely gets my vote.

    {"commentId":449436,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"celestina"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#11 - Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:52 PM EST
    {"commentId":450304,"authorDomain":"fawnshore"}

    Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector.

    {"commentId":450304,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"fawnshore"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#12 - Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:15 AM EST
    {"commentId":450384,"authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}

    That's not funny, I don't care who you are.

    {"commentId":450384,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"michaelsautter"}
    • 2 votes
    #12.1 - Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:04 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":455851,"authorDomain":"allpurpose"}

    Lil Man or any Wayans Brother movie

    {"commentId":455851,"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401","authorDomain":"allpurpose"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#13 - Tue Jan 2, 2007 2:30 PM EST
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"63817","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"63817","contentId":"496401"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking