
The cover story in today's New York Times magazine is a landmark piece by Michael Pollan called Unhappy Meals. I think it's the best thing he's ever written, possibly because it speaks so eloquently to my own prejudices.
Here's the short version: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."
But the meat of the article, so to speak, is an attack on what Pollan calls "nutritionism": the ideology that holds that the best way to a healthy diet is to ignore foods and concentrate on ingesting the proper amounts and ratios of nutrients lurking within them. This has led to many absurdities, like this one:
I like real food that comes from Mother Nature
and I try and avoid crap that comes out of man's
chemical labs and factories.
Nice seed. The link to the Unhappy Meals article is excellent...and long. I've bookmarked it to read in detail later.
Yes the link is good, it explains nicely how the Nutritionistas, agri-business and journalism together have created the public focus on nutrients on labels instead of just eating food.
I ran out to buy the Sunday NYT - too late - will lounge about at my local library reading it tom'w.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |