The cover story in today's New York Times magazine is a landmark piece by Michael Pollan called Unhappy Meals. I think it's the best thing he's ever written, possibly because it speaks so eloquently to my own prejudices.
Here's the short version: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."
But the meat of the article, so to speak, is an attack on what Pollan calls "nutritionism": the ideology that holds that the best way to a healthy diet is to ignore foods and concentrate on ingesting the proper amounts and ratios of nutrients lurking within them. This has led to many absurdities, like this one:
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (4)
I like real food that comes from Mother Nature
and I try and avoid crap that comes out of man's
chemical labs and factories.
- 2 votes
Nice seed. The link to the Unhappy Meals article is excellent...and long. I've bookmarked it to read in detail later.
- 2 votes
Yes the link is good, it explains nicely how the Nutritionistas, agri-business and journalism together have created the public focus on nutrients on labels instead of just eating food.
- 2 votes
I ran out to buy the Sunday NYT - too late - will lounge about at my local library reading it tom'w.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.



