
Remember Ida? It's been just a month since the fossil primate made her debut on the History Channel where she was called a "missing link" between humans and primitive primates and a "revolutionary scientific find that will change everything." But Ida may be robbed of her claim to that title by a new fossil primate from Asia, published today. "It shows that Ida is out of the running as a [human] ancestor," says the fossil's discoverer, paleontologist K. Christopher Beard of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
It takes a while for scientists to figure things out and even then another new fossil can changes things entirely.
"Missing link" is a bad term in any case... all fossils (and all living organisms, for that matter) are transitional in some sense or another.
New information causing revisions of the operating theories-- exactly how the scientific method proceeds.
This comes as no great shock since Ida was never really "in the running" as a human ancestor. It was established quite early that Ida was not antecedent to humans and apes. She was, at best, a very early primate, but the find is still remarkable nonetheless.
I find it interesting that the origins being traced from Asia, not Africa, is now an accepted theory and could radically change a lot of other thoughts, in regard to the origins of man.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |